↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 McCue, Patricia Buchanan, Tom Martin, Colin R.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. "Screening instruments for psychiatric morbidity in chronic fatigue syndrome". "The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: An updated literature review". ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Bjelland, Ingvar Dahl, Alv A Haug, Tone Tangen Neckelmann, Dag (February 1, 2002)."The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale". Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ( View).2014, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Abstract).
2012, The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: An updated literature review (Abstract).2006, Screening for psychological distress using internet administration of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome (Full text).1998, Screening instruments for psychiatric morbidity in chronic fatigue syndrome, (Full text).It has been heavily used by British paediatrician Esther Crawley. HADS is sometimes used in research studies to approximate levels is anxiety or depression in patients who are physically ill. McCue et al used questions they devised from the CDC's Fukuda criteria, and the less common London ME criteria, and found that the in ME/CFS patients the HADS, which was designed to assess two dimensions (anxiety and depression), actually better fit a three-dimensional model of Anhedonic depression, Negative depression and Autonomic anxiety. McCue at al (2006) also found the HADS valid in patients with CFS, and noted that internet based use have higher scores. Morriss & Wearden (1998) found a cut-off of 9/10 useful for anxiety or depression in the HADS scale when compared with a clinical interview, however this was based on the broad Oxford criteria of CFS, which may include patients with other forms of unexplained chronic fatigue.
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale has been validated in many different patient populations, including cancer patients, and in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome.
0 kommentar(er)
